Free Shipping & No Import Duty in the US
RLT Home vs 7 Leading Brands
We lined our panels up against seven leading brands, wavelength by wavelength, dollar for dollar, using each brand's own published numbers. Their wins are on the table too. That is how confident we are.
Six Reasons We Stand Apart
The category is strong, and it has caught up on EMF and lab testing. These are the differences that still set RLT Home apart, before you even reach the spec sheet.
Deepest spectrum on the table
7 wavelengths weighted deep: 19% at 810nm, 14% at 1064nm, and 56% of all output at 810nm and beyond.
Every rival: 12.5% or less at the deepest band, or noneA plan written for you, free
After you order, our science team builds your weekly protocol: mode, distance, timing, positioning.
None of the 7 brands here includes oneEverything in the box
Motorized stand on full-body models, two sets of eye protection, insured express shipping, your plan.
Rival stands: $79 to $1,997 extraFull body from one panel
The Elite and Ultra cover head to toe from a single 64 to 65 inch panel. No chaining panels together.
Several rivals max out near 36 inches60 days, zero fees
Try it at home with no restocking fee, backed by a 3-year warranty. Return postage is your only exit cost.
Some: 30 days. Others: 20% restockingNumbers you can check
Spectrometer and solar readings at five distances, plus per-wavelength percentages, on every model.
Most publish one figure, at one distanceRLT Home vs The Field
Every figure below is each brand's own published specification, checked in 2026. More listed wavelengths is not more therapy; what matters is how much output each band gets. That is why we show the allocation, and say plainly where a brand does not publish one. Where a competitor leads, such as a longer warranty, it is shown.
| Feature | RLT HomeTotal SpectrumBest Value | Brand 115-yr legacy brand | Brand 2Best-known name, app-first | Brand 3Transparency leader, 5-yr warranty | Brand 48 wavelengths, even mix | Brand 5Wide size range, no 1064nm | Brand 6Budget pick | Brand 7Newest entrant, 9 wavelengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light & Spectrum | ||||||||
| Wavelengths | 7480 to 1064nm | 7480 to 1060nm | 2660 + 850nm | 7590 to 1060nm | 8630 to 1060nm | 4 to 8590 to 940nm | 2 to 4610 to 850nm | 9480 to 1060nm |
| Wavelength allocation, published?How much output each band actually gets | Yes, in full480: 6% · 630: 19% · 660: 19% · 810: 19% · 830: 14% · 850: 9% · 1064: 14% | Yes, in full480: 2% · 630: 10% · 660: 40% · 810: 5% · 830: 5% · 850: 36% · 1060: 4% ~76% sits in just 660 + 850nm | ~50 / 50%660 / 850 | Yes, in full590: 16% · 630: 17% · 660: 17% · 810: 14% · 830: 14% · 850: 13% · 1060: 9% | Even split~12.5% per band, 8 bands | Yes, in full590: 6% · 630: 22% · 660: 22% · 810: 17% · 830: 17% · 850: 17% | Even split25% each: 610 · 660 · 810 · 830nm (Ultra) | Not published |
| Near-infrared share (810nm and deeper) | 56%weighted to the deepest bands | 50%mostly at 850nm | ~50%850nm only | 50% | ~50% | ~51%no 1064nm | ~50%varies by model | Not published |
| Deepest band and its shareHow deep does it go? | 1064nm at 14%highest published deep share here | 1060nm at 4% | None850nm max | 1060nm at 9% | 1060nm~12.5% | None940nm max, flagship only | None850nm max | 1060nmshare not published |
| Power & Optics | ||||||||
| LED chip type | Single-chip 5Wfull power into each wavelength | Single-chip 3W | Dual-chip 5W | Dual-chip 5W | Dual-chip 5W | Dual-chip 5W | Quad-chip | Dual-chip |
| Beam angle | 30°Ultra adds 15/30/60° multi-beam | 60° | 60° | 60° | 30° | 60° | 60° | Not published |
| Published irradiance at 6 inmW/cm², by instrument | 122 spectrometer / 179 solarflagship Elite; across the line: 99 to 122 spectrometer, 170 to 179 solar; also published at 12 to 48 in | ~90 spectrometer / ~185 solar | Brand-rated figuremeter type not disclosed | 90 spectrometer / 189 solarpublishes both | ~81 spectrometerpublishes both meters | 73 spectrometer / 160 solarcurrent flagship | 165 solar marketedmanual states ~100; no spectrometer figure | 178 solarno spectrometer figure |
| EMF, published? | 0.0 µT at treatment distance | 0.0 µT at 4 in | Not published | Publishes a low figure | Very low, published | None detectablethird-party checked | 0.0 µT at 6 in | "Low EMF" badgeno figure, distance, or report |
| What's Included | ||||||||
| StandThe biggest hidden cost | Includedmotorized on full-body models | Extra$79 to $869 | Extra$200+ | Extra$500; motorised $900 | Extra$350 to $995 | Extra$139 to $349 | Tabletop built infloor stand extra | Extra$149 to $1,997; bundled in some promos |
| Eye protection included | 2 sets freereading + blackout | 1 pair included | Extra | Goggles included | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | 1 pair included |
| Free personalized usage plan | Yesbuilt for you after purchase | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Treatment modes | 9 + custombuilt on clinical study data | Presets + app + voice | Standard + pulsing | Presets + pulsing + dimming | Presets + app | 3 onboard + app | Basic + pulse | 9 + per-band dimming and pulsing |
| Shipping and Insurance | Free expressUS, UK, Canada, Europe; insured | Free US | Free over $500, US | Free over thresholdregion dependent | Free over $400 | Free US | Free US | Charged at checkout |
| Risk & Ownership | ||||||||
| Trial & restockingWhat does changing your mind cost? | 60 daysno restocking fee; you cover return shipping unless faulty | 60 days20% restocking | 60 days | 30 days | 60 days | 60 daysno fee | 60 daysno fee | 60 daysno restocking fee stated |
| Warranty | 3 years | 3 years | 2 years | 5 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years |
| Offline (no app required) | Yesno data sharing | Optional app | App | No app | App | App | No app | Yestouchscreen + remote |
| True single-panel full body | Yes64 to 65 in + modular | No36 in max | Nomodular chains | Yes | Yes | Borderline | Narrow panels | No36 in panel |
| Flagship all-in priceWhat does full-body really cost, stand included? | $4,995motorized stand, eye protection and plan included | $5,846full-body setup with stand | $8,799full-body setup with stand | $5,146full-body setup with stand | $6,590full-body setup with stand | $4,919full-body setup with stand | $3,445full-body setup with stand | $4,997full-body setup with stand |
Competitor brands are anonymized as Brand 1 to Brand 7. All figures reflect each manufacturer's own publicly published specifications, checked in 2026, and may change. Where a competitor leads, such as a longer warranty, it is shown.
We anonymize competitors so this page stays about specs, not names. Want to know which brand is which? Ask our team on live chat or at contact@redlighttherapyhome.com and we will tell you, along with the source of every figure.
RLT Home vs Each Brand
Pick a brand to see the head-to-head.
| Key fact | Brand 1 | RLT Home |
|---|---|---|
| Deepest band | 1060nm at 4% | 1064nm at 14% |
| LED power | Single-chip 3W | Single-chip 5W |
| Stand | $79 to $869 extra | Included |
| Returns | 20% restocking fee | No restocking fee |
Brand 1 is an established, capable panel with third-party-verified irradiance and app plus voice control. The differences are in the engineering: it drives its single-chip LEDs at 3 watts against RLT Home's 5, spreads a wider 60-degree beam against our focused 30 degrees, and skews output to the shallow bands, with only 4% at its deepest 1060nm band.
Bottom line: more depth per LED, stand in the box, and an exit that costs you nothing but return postage.
| Key fact | Brand 2 | RLT Home |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 2 (660 + 850nm) | 7 (480 to 1064nm) |
| Deepest band | 850nm | 1064nm at 14% |
| Warranty | 2 years | 3 years |
| Full body | Chained narrow panels | One 64 to 65 in panel |
Brand 2 is one of the most recognized names in the category, with a polished app and a patented pulsing mode. But every panel it sells emits only two wavelengths, 660nm and 850nm, with no 810nm and nothing deeper than 850nm, on dual-chip LEDs that split each diode's power between two bands.
Bottom line: seven wavelengths against two, one panel instead of a chain, and a longer warranty.
| Key fact | Brand 3 | RLT Home |
|---|---|---|
| Deepest band | 1060nm at 9% | 1064nm at 14% |
| Irradiance at 6 in | 90 spectrometer / 189 solar | 122 spectrometer / 179 solar |
| Warranty | 5 years (their win) | 3 years |
| Trial | 30 days | 60 days |
Brand 3 is the closest to RLT Home on transparency: it publishes per-wavelength density, both meter readings, and a low EMF figure, and it backs its panels with this group's longest warranty, 5 years. Credit where due. Where RLT Home pulls ahead is depth, delivery, and risk: 14% at 1064nm against their 9% at 1060nm, a focused 30-degree beam against 60, and 60 days to decide against 30.
Bottom line: they win the warranty; we win depth, beam, trial length and what is in the box.
| Key fact | Brand 4 | RLT Home |
|---|---|---|
| Allocation | ~12.5% per band, even | Weighted: 19% at 810, 14% at 1064 |
| LED design | Dual-chip 5W | Single-chip 5W |
| Stand | $350 to $995 extra | Included |
| Plan | None | Free, personalized |
Brand 4 lists the most wavelengths here, 8 bands, shares our focused 30-degree beam, and publishes both meter readings with very low EMF. The catch is distribution: its dual-chip LEDs spread output roughly evenly at about 12.5% per band, so no deep band is emphasized and each wavelength's peak power is divided across the chip.
Bottom line: eight even slices spread thin, or seven weighted where the evidence points.
| Key fact | Brand 5 | RLT Home |
|---|---|---|
| Deepest band | 940nm, flagship only | 1064nm on every model |
| Irradiance at 6 in | 73 spectrometer / 160 solar | 122 spectrometer / 179 solar |
| LED design | Dual-chip 5W | Single-chip 5W |
| Stand | $139 to $349 extra | Included |
Brand 5 is a strong, honest mid-market choice: verified irradiance, no detectable EMF, published allocation, and a wide model range at fair prices. Its limit is depth. No panel it sells includes a 1064nm band; the deepest it reaches is 940nm, and only on its flagship. It also runs dual-chip LEDs and a wider 60-degree beam.
Bottom line: a fair panel without the deepest band; ours ships with it on every model.
| Key fact | Brand 6 | RLT Home |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 2 to 4, 850nm max | 7, incl. 1064nm |
| Irradiance claim | 165 solar marketed; manual ~100 | 122 spectrometer / 179 solar, both published |
| Allocation | 25% each across 4 bands (Ultra) | Weighted: 19% at 810, 14% at 1064 |
| Full body | Narrow panels | One 64 to 65 in panel |
Brand 6 is the value pick, with low entry prices, a built-in tabletop stand, and no restocking fee. But the spectrum is shallow, 2 to 4 wavelengths topping out at 850nm, the marketed output figure does not match its own manual, and the larger panels are narrow, making true single-panel full-body coverage difficult.
Bottom line: a fine starter panel; not a deep-tissue tool, and the numbers do not add up.
| Key fact | Brand 7 | RLT Home |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 9 listed; allocation not published | 7, allocation published in full |
| Irradiance | 178 solar; no spectrometer figure | 122 spectrometer / 179 solar |
| Test data | No lab reports, EMF or beam figures | Both meters, five distances, EMF stated |
| Full body | 36 in panel, stand extra | 64 to 65 in, motorized stand incl. |
Brand 7 lists the widest spectrum here, nine wavelengths including 590nm amber and 670nm, with per-wavelength dimming and pulsing up to 10,000 Hz, features we genuinely do not offer. What it does not publish is the part that matters: no wavelength percentages, no spectrometer reading behind its solar figure, no beam angle, no measured EMF, and no third-party test reports.
Bottom line: more bands on the box; fewer numbers behind them. We publish ours.
The bottom line
Seven strong brands, and real credit where they lead: a longer warranty here, a lower entry price there, pulsing modes we do not offer. But on the questions that decide results, how much light reaches deep tissue, what the panel really costs with a stand in the box, and whether the brand shows you its numbers, RLT Home publishes more and delivers more. Try it for 60 days and measure it yourself.
RLT Home is listed with the U.S. FDA as a Class II medical device (product code ILY, 21 CFR 890.5500); the manufacturer is FDA-registered. Because this device category is 510(k)-exempt, panels like ours are FDA-registered rather than FDA-cleared, which is standard for this product type. FDA registration and listing are not the same as FDA approval, clearance, or endorsement. The brands compared here are, to our knowledge, registered on the same basis; none has been granted FDA clearance or approval for these panels.
Our products must be treated as general wellness products as per the General Wellness Policy issued by the FDA (United States of America). Red light therapy is a research-led field with new insights emerging frequently. We do not claim that RLT Home products prevent disease or cure ailments or conditions. For any questions pertaining to your individual needs or if in doubt, we recommend consulting a qualified health professional.
Comparison figures reflect each manufacturer's publicly published specifications, checked in 2026, and are provided for general information; specifications and pricing may change. Competing brands are shown anonymously; our team will confirm identities and sources on request. © 2026 RLT Home.